Today, at least, there was an opportunity to demand explanations and discuss responsibilities. However, what happened only reinforced the concerns. If structural failures are not recognized and responsibilities are not assumed, any attempt at improvement will remain superficial. What was said — and what was avoided — confirms that the management of shelters continues to be a pending debt of the State. For months, what prevailed were scandals and resignations at Senniaf. That the Minister of Social Development appeared before the National Assembly and answered the deputies was, in principle, a step in the right direction. The minister's performance left more doubts than certainties, and the interruption of the session evidenced to what extent politics interferes when it comes to clarifying the actions of the authorities. Without self-criticism, no reform is possible. The lack of clear answers does not convey control, but opacity. Because the question remains the same: who protects those who must be protected?
